Friday, October 14, 2005

Just Doing What Teddy Says

The latest "screw 'em" from the grave is detailed here, but it's worth reproducing -- in as many places and as often as possible -- this quote from President Teddy Roosevelt. It to a great degree explains why I write many of the things I write, and why I get so far past reasonable with the path, the weak path of selfish fear, so many people have taken these days.

Teddy explained in 1918 that the president is merely the most important among a large number of public servants, and:

He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able and disinterested service to the nation as a whole.


"Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right. Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile.

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or anyone else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."

Video IPod: 4GM Baby Steps

Leave the country for two days, and this is what happens. They go and start the revolution without me. The only thing more annoying is that Michael Jackson is apparently staying in my hotel in London. They keep asking for my room key whenever I go down to the bar.

The video IPod, of course, is a miserable idea. I'm one of those who believe people associate certain types of entertainment with certain viewing habits/places -- one of the reasons downloaded movies are grifted by far less than 1% of the population, and the reason XBoxes and PS2's bury PC games in sales. The flat-screen G5 is the real darling here, engineered to match our established viewing habits. Only 20 inches, though? Wonder what'll come out for Christmas, hmmmm?

Some have e-mailed me to tell me that my 4th Generation Media has arrived. This is not technically true (and hey, I should be getting rich from this, right? Where are my filthy monies?). In my formulation, 4gM is a media, not a distribution, philosophy. To recap our central metaphor:

An effective 4GW army projects its force past the battlefield in order to directly affect the political will of the opponent.

An effective 4GM entertainment source projects its force past the mainstream media distribution system in order to directly connect with its audience.

Today's news is a crucial first step in the tactics of 4GM. You'll note Apple has done a cunning little sidestep here, in that their player will not play ripped movies -- but decrypted rips converted to Quicktime will play. Yes, yes Hollywood, we have your back ... suckers. Apple did this because, unlike the studios, they have remembered they are in the business of making money, while the studios gits are in the business of maintaining the status quo. An entire generation of new media humans will now have as their first introduction to online-received media be through proprietary Apple software, not Divx.

The more I think about this, the more obvious it becomes Apple has played Disney like a chump, and had Disney whispering "thank you, sir, and may I have another?" Apple just "allowed" Disney to bootstrap them into the number one spot in new media, even a step ahead of Bill Gates obsession with developing a "set-top box" run by Windows. And with LCD HDTV -- no, wait, we'll pick that up in a second.

You can see Disney being dragged kicking and screaming into this by some of their smarter execs. A resolution of 320x240? Ugh. And they will only really be offering product that's already been established as successful in the traditional TV "battlespace" -- hence my comment that this is really about tactics, not strategy or operational level rethinking. We won't be into full-on 4GM until original content starts popping up on these services, and succeeding.

However, this is an important first step. They are monetizing the process -- excellent. The price point is exactly what my research has shown to be the right amount, less than or equal to $2.00 for a TV episode. As I've stated before, at that price you can run a very, very spiffy television show with a little over one million viewers per episode. That's at the top end of the download audience right now, but add that to the hardware/cultural innovations ... again, hold onto that for a bit.

The real questions is what the next step by Disney's competitors will be. Will they also cut deals with Apple? Will the competing media companies try to form their own proprietary download systems? Time Warner, should've had a BitTorrent front-end grafted onto AOL ages ago: we'll see if it's too late now or even if AOL winds up in somebody else's pocket. But what's Fox/News Corp going to do? Sony? Enjoy those shitty DRM wars.

There's one more crucial step to accomplish before we really break free into the new horizon: getting the entertainment from computer to TV. And yes, I know, you can stream stuff, and the new Video IPod will have a connecting cradle -- but I mean seamlessly. Less than two steps. As in my 70-year-old mother-in-law can use it seamlessly, with the same ease to which she's become a Tivo addict. Pardon me, a Rogers Digital Cable DVR addict.

(That reminding us Tivo will go down as the biggest missed opportunity in New Media history. They got there the first with the most. They achieved that singular cultural success -- they became the verb for the process. And they pissed that early lead away. If the Netflix deal is what I've heard it is -- you download the movies on your computer then transfer them to the Tivo -- it's already doomed. Although I root for them, I think that they've got less than a year to turn things around before becoming a footnote.)

This hardware hurdle one of the reasons that although this Apple news is nice, I'm really watching the new Google/Comcast buddy-buddy relationship with far more interest. I will state this plainly, at the risk of open mocking when I am proven wrong: Comcast and other cable companies are the companies who will eventually win, and define our media future. They control the pipe. Period. A Google/Comcast combo -- jesus. Sure, you have an Apple Airport or a Windows-based PC with a router ... but who controls the cable to your house so all that tech can work? The day Comcast and its ilk declare "All that 'streaming media' you get over the internet -- you get it on your TV, through our box (which 85% already are used to having), and you don't have to do anything but point and click with your remote in the living room" it is ALL. OVER. And if there's not even a box ... most bleeding edge HDTV's/LCD's have enough integrated processing power to run cable company software. "Yes," I hear some of you say, "and to hook up to your ethernet or WiFi" but that's not the bloody point.

This is what I was mentioning earlier about the Windows set-top box. Microsoft, as is its tradition, is trying to crack an egg with a hammer. "Your Windows-brand set-top box will play your filthy TV shows AND run all your favorite Microsoft programs and have the spiffiest front-end --" Bah. Nobody wants to do spreadsheets on their TV. Nobody really wants to surf on their TV, really either, although that habit may eventually evolve. I know a big part of advertising and succesful marketing is convincing people that they need something they don't need, but it won't work when there's already a need that's not being met, and a very simple solution to it sitting right there in the marketplace. All most people would need to feel like they're living in the goddam 22nd Century is a variant of the very dumb box they already have. Yes, the rumored AirPort video streaming gizmo should be nice, but if the cable companies get there first, with the tech they've already mastered ...

Whoever gets there first -- with the fewest pieces of new hardware -- will win.

Thursday, October 13, 2005

Where have I gone?

London, kids, and light blogging because some of us flew on a red-eye. Got completely lost (which really is the only way to see a city), and then Mike from Visible Monsters (sidebar) was nice enough to take me for Chinese and a pint. So weird being outside the US again. The TV news... it's... it's like there are other countries or something. Talk amongst yourselves while I find a dann ethernet cable and can stop blogging from the hotel TV internet conection.

Monday, October 10, 2005

Dingo redux

The blog-novel DINGO updates again today, with the nice Mr. Nelson showing us his old-school action-sequence chops.

20,000 Dead

Seriously, Mother Nature, we goddam get it. We are sinners in the hands of an angry planet.

Entire towns gone. Millions homeless. Aid choked off in places because it's a political hot zone. Considering last month I blogged -- and we raised a fantastic amount of money -- for disaster relief in one of the richest countries in the world, for a disaster an order of magnitude less horrible than this, I've switched the sidebar over. As always, I'll match all donations. The only caveat is that I'm going to do a bit of research and find the most straight-line route to getting the money somewhere on the ground. It may still wind up being Red Cross, but we'll see.

Personally, I want to raise at least as much money for the Kashmir victims as I did for Katrina for a variety of reasons. However, knowing many of you went to the wall for the Katrina relief, I'm not going to hit you up harder -- I'm going to try to add even MORE value to the blog. It's incumbent upon me to squeeze a single buck out of the several thouand humans who visit here every month. We'll have even more screenwriting advice, more political writing, more sci-culture writing ... and I'm going to hit up some humans I'm working with for some very, very VERY cool geek auction items we'll toss up on E-Bay. I'm not promising a pair of Mark Waid's underwear, guaranteed worn at least once, but I think that's a very likely possibility. Particularly after our last party.

Now as I said, I'm pretty stacked for October so I wasn't expecting to produce much. (although The Crazification Factor has become ridiculously popular on the web, who knew?) This fundraiser will be open-ended, probably rolling into Novemeber.

So, back to work. And remember, as always, I'm not hitting you up. You find something amusing or interesting, drop in a buck.

Take care, and hope everyone within blogshot is safe and warm.

Sunday, October 09, 2005

PB Wiki

Wow. Completely new obsession, I'll be using this for all the new projects, plus my little gaming project. Easiest Wiki on the planet -- PB Wiki, as easy as making a peanut-butter sandwich.